Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Company (1856) 11 Ex Ch 781

Facts
A severe frost caused a water pipe installed by Birmingham Waterworks to burst. The resulting flood damaged the claimant’s property. The pipe had been installed according to standard practice at the time. The claimant argued that the company was negligent in failing to anticipate such extreme weather.
Issue
Was the waterworks company in breach of its duty of care to the claimant by failing to prevent damage caused by the frozen pipe?
Decision
The court held that the company was not negligent. The frost was an exceptionally rare event, and the company had acted in accordance with reasonable standards of care for the circumstances.
Legal Principle
Negligence is assessed objectively, against the standard of a reasonable person. Liability does not arise for extremely unlikely events, provided reasonable care has been taken.
It introduces the reasonable person standard, forming the benchmark for all breach of duty analysis.
Importance
Foundational authority for objective standard of care.
Confirms that ordinary competence, not perfection, is expected.
Still cited in breach assessments for all types of negligence claims.
![McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 (HL)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/44ca5483023540b685861fd3eea6c595.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_654,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/44ca5483023540b685861fd3eea6c595.jpg)
![Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41, [2005] 1 AC 134 (HL)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/11062b_d47fa422d26c45bbb7689aeba61f9ac8~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_980,h_551,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/11062b_d47fa422d26c45bbb7689aeba61f9ac8~mv2.jpeg)
![Barker v Corus (UK) plc [2006] UKHL 20, [2006] 2 AC 572 (HL)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/11062b_35dd5ca259d74a8392cee0e294d361a7~mv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_980,h_653,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/11062b_35dd5ca259d74a8392cee0e294d361a7~mv2.jpeg)
Comments