Day v High Performance Sports Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1445, [2003] PIQR P18 (CA)

Facts

The claimant was injured during a professional motorcycle racing event. The race organisers had allowed the event to proceed under conditions that involved a degree of inherent risk. The claimant argued that the organisers had failed to take sufficient precautions to prevent the accident.

The court had to consider whether the standard of care should be adjusted where an activity serves a social or sporting purpose and involves voluntary participation in risk.

---

Issue

Does the standard of care change where the defendant’s conduct occurs in the context of sporting events or activities involving public benefit and inherent risk?

---

Decision

The Court of Appeal held that negligence must still be assessed objectively, but the context of the activity is relevant. Where individuals voluntarily participate in inherently risky sporting activities, the court will consider the nature of the sport and the practical realities involved.

On the facts, liability depended on whether reasonable safety measures appropriate to that sporting context had been taken.

---

Legal Principle

The reasonable person standard is applied in context. Courts recognise that certain activities (e.g. competitive sport, emergency services) involve inherent risks.

The law does not require elimination of all risk, particularly where the activity has social utility or public benefit.

---

Importance

• Demonstrates flexibility in breach analysis.

• Relevant in sporting injury and emergency-response cases.

• Shows that public interest and social value are part of the balancing exercise when assessing reasonable care.